Eric Peters (https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2023/07/08/green-is-old/) posted a link to this video:
So, I decided to investigate a bit further.
For starters, let’s try some (possibly more representative) numbers.
California numbers, for example.
It happens that I live in California, but so do 39.24 million other Americans, out of 331.9 million U.S residents, or 12% of U.S. population, which makes it the most populated U.S. state. Texas is second at 29.5, Florida third at 21.8, and New York fourth at 19.8 million.
But first, the replacement cost for an IC engine. The video does not specify whether the replacement is a brand new, or a re-manufactured engine. Judging by the $10,000 price, I would guess brand new. I also surmise that a Ford (or any other make) dealer service department would refuse to install a re-manufactured engine (prove me wrong).
The *installed* cost for a NAPA remanufactured 300cid straight six in my ’89 F150 was ~$5,500 five years ago, of which, IIRC, ~$3,500 was the cost of the engine. I do not recall the independent repair shop’s labor rate at that time, but I guarantee it was less then the local Ford dealer’s shop rate.
So, we can, and should, discuss shop labor rates. According to the video, dealer shop rate in Alabama was (205)/(15) = $135/hr.
The Ford dealer in Norco, CA (Hemborg Ford) charges $159/hr, last I checked. Independent shop will generally charge less, sometimes quite a bit less, because they want and need your business. But, for now, let’s compare apples to apples. So, dealer labor rates are evidently (159)/(135) = 1.18 the cost of Alabama prices. (20 hr)*($159/hr) = $3180.
Now let’s talk about fuel costs for IC versus battery powered, using California prices, paid by 12% of U.S. population.
First, gasoline costs. California has notoriously high gasoline prices, due in part to high fuel taxes, in part to special anti-pollution fuel formulations, etc. CA prices are significantly above national average, which was used in the video.
National average price = $3.93/gallon (presumably 87 octane unleaded)
One recent California price = $4.80/gallon (87 octane, Chevron or Mobil, ZIP Code 92882)
So, name brand 87 octane in CA costs (4.80)/(3.93) = 1.22 the national average.
(maybe more in L.A., maybe less in Stockton, idk)
Next, let’s look at electricity costs in California, versus the rest of the U.S. California is notorious, not only for high gasoline (& diesel) costs, but also high electricity costs. As a customer of Southern California Edison, I am most familiar with SCE rates, so will use those for purposes of this discussion.
SCE offer two pricing plans, the first being “tiered” pricing,” the second being “time of use.”
Tiered rates are given here:
https://www.sce.com/de/residential/rates/Standard-Residential-Rate-Plan
whereas a TOU plan designed specifically for electric vehicle owners is given here:
https://www.sce.com/de/node/1273
If you choose tiered pricing, you are certain to be paying the Tier 2 price to charge your EV, or $0.42/kwh. If you select TOU-D-PRIME, available only to EV owners, you will pay $0.26/kwh off peak, and a whopping $0.66/kwh for all electricity used between 4PM and 9PM weekdays. You know, the time of day when you get home from work, crank up the A/C to cool down your house, maybe turn on the TV to catch the evening propaganda (excuse me, “news”), and fire up the good ol’ electric cookstove you have been “mandated” to use in order to “save the planet” while cooking your dinner. But wait, your EV is knackered from a hard day’s commute, and you need to juice it up for 30-45 minutes to make a fast grocery run for the “exotic” ingredients in that new Thai recipe you wish to try, plus a bit of liquid refreshment to aid in winding down from the work day’s stress. Ka-ching! $0.66/kwh, comrade. It’s either that, or eat raw worms and drink brake fluid. Well, maybe straight rotgut whiskey, or methanol.
Now, let’s put it all together.
For the battery powered model,
Using the (installed) EV battery prices from the video, and assuming 200,000 mile battery life:
“Standard” EV battery = $32,000/200,000 mi = $0.16/mi. battery cost
“Extended Range” = $40,230/200,000 mi = $0.20/mi. battery cost
Electricity consumption is given as 48 kwh/100 mi, or 0.48 kwh/mi.
Charging only off-peak on a TOU rate plan yields an energy cost of
(0.48 kwh/mi)*($0.26/kwh) =$0.12/mi
Using Tier 1, the energy cost would be
(0.48)*($0.32) = $0.15/mi
Using Tier 2 (more likely)
(0.48)*($0.42) = $0.20/mi
Lowest total cost (standard battery + off peak TOU electricity):
$0.16 + $0.12 = $0.28/mi
Highest cost (extended range battery + Tier 2 electricity):
$0.20 + $0.20 = $0.40/mi
And for the IC model,
Ass-u-ming a remanufactured V8 can be purchased for 75% of the cost of a new engine (actually, this is a guess, as I have not priced a remanufactured V8)
Estimated engine cost = (0.75)*($10,000) = $7,500.
Sales tax @ 8.75% = $656.
Installation by independent shop which charges $150/hr. shop rate
(actual current shop rate of a reputable shop in ZIP Code 92882)
20 hr. @ $150 = $3000.
Installed cost (estimated) = $7,500 + $656. + $3000. = $11,156.
Assuming an engine life of 230,000 mi (my actual experience with the factory 300cid straight six in my 1989 F150) gives engine replacement cost of
$11,156/230,000 = $0.05/mi.
The fuel consumption estimate is 19mi/gal, which at $4.80/gal gives:
($4.8)/(19) = $0.25/mi
Engine replacement plus fuel cost = $0.05 + $0.25 = $0.30/mi
Now, the above figure *does* *not* *equal* the total operating cost of an IC engine, because it omits normal IC engine maintenance and repairs, which are *NOT* negligible. To list just a few:
— scheduled oil changes
— spark plugs, plug wires, coil, distributor cap
(typical “electrical tune up”)
— replacement starter battery (12V)
— belts and hoses
Nor have I considered power transmission to the wheels. An IC engine which uses a manual transmission also requires a clutch, and the clutch disk, at east, *will* need replacement, at some point, which is expensive, due to labor involved. Also likely candidates for replacement will be clutch release bearing, clutch slave cylinder and/or slave cylinder hydraulic hose, clutch master cylinder, and the actual clutch assembly. All this shit is expensive to replace, so you should not ignore the cost when estimating total cost of propulsion.
My experience with manual transmissions is they last a long time, provided they are not abused, such as by attempting to transmit more power than they were designed for (i.e., “hot rodding” the engine). The Borg-Warner T18 in my 1989 F150 is just as installed at the factory. Some day, of course, it will inevitably break, if operated long enough, but “someday,” knock wood, is not yet here. About automatic transmissions I know very little, so will say nothing.
What components are likely to break when transmitting power from an electric motor to the drive wheels of a vehicle? I think *no* one* knows the answer to that question, because these devices have not been around long enough for anyone to know.
And that’s my US$0.02
This would be funny, if it were not so pathetic:
“None shall pass,” quoth the Black Knight.
Now comes the Seedy of El Lay, a.k.a. (Total) Los(s) Angeles, which aspires to block off federal Interstate highways, and send its own goons to steal from motorists who wish only to pass through, not stop in, their location.
https://12ft.io/proxy?ref=&q=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-05-19/new-york-city-is-moving-on-congestion-pricing-los-angeles-should-be-next
>The agency is working on a study analyzing three potential locations for pilot projects: on roads and freeways into downtown; on Interstate 10 between downtown and Santa Monica; and on freeways and canyon roads that cross the Santa Monica Mountains between the San Fernando Valley and the L.A. Basin.
Time for a new map.
Here there be dragons?
Nope. Here there be thieves.
First, destroy the pipelines which provided abundant, low cost natural gas to Western Europe.
Next, remove natural gas from the U.S. market, liquify it, and ship it to Europe to replace the supply which was previously destroyed, at higher cost to the end users. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/sempra-energy-strikes-20-year-lng-supply-deal-with-polands-pkn-orlen-2023-01-25/
Now, watch the cost of natural gas in the U.S double or even triple, as the country experiences one of the coldest winters in recent history.
Some say it was the U.S. government which sabotaged Nord Stream 2. https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream?r=5mz1&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
If that is true, it implies that the military might of the U.S. government was used to benefit commercial enterprise (a.k.a. “business interests”), which is pretty much the textbook definition of fascism, although personally, I might prefer the term thugocracy, or, the “Washington Mafia.”
LA DWP is proposing to convert a natural gas fired power plant to GREEN hydrogen, produced entirely by electrolysis using electricity generated from solar panels. Clean energy, right?
https://12ft.io/proxy?ref=&q=https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-02-08/l-a-is-shutting-down-a-coastal-gas-plant-and-replacing-it-with-hydrogen
But noooo.
“Jasmin Vargas, an organizer with Food and Water Watch, described hydrogen as ‘fundamentally racist and inequitable.’ ”
Who knew? The most abundant element in the universe is “racist!”
Not the most racist, though. That would obviously be carbon, because the “black” form of carbon (graphite) is valued much less than the “white” form (diamond). Racist, racist, racist!
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/02/03/joe-biden-more-half-women-my-administration-women/
pResident Biden sez:
“More than half the women in my administration are women.”
How nice for you, Joe! Who could have guessed, all things considered.
Meanwhile,
What the hell, why not “Rollerball Monday?”
Recently, we have the German Foreign Minister proclaiming that Germany is at war with Russia. Might as well have some music.
From my good friend Adi Heidler, who is responding to this post on Lew Rockwell:
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/01/ryan-mcmaken/raise-the-social-security-age-to-at-least-75/
Guten Morgen, Herr McMaken!
As a member of the class of parasites which draw “Social Security” benefits, it seems obvious to me that a three point program must be implemented, and promptly, in order to bring this program in balance with Nature.
1. Firstly, it is obvious that the remedy for too long life expectancy is to promote behavior which will reduce life expectancy. Smoking of tobacco should be high on the list, as it is known to cause lung cancer (which killed my father at age 54) as well as heart disease. Bring back Torches_of_Freedom! Obesity, alcohol, and drug abuse must all be enlisted in this cause.
2. Secondly, there is no reason that any “Social Security” handouts should be exempt from taxation. Today’s policy of taxing only the benefits of those with significant other income must be eliminated. “Social Security” benefits must be regarded as “self employment income,” and therefore subject to “self employment tax” of 15.3%, plus taxation as “ordinary income” at the recipient’s marginal rate. If the lowest “income tax” bracket is 20%, this would recover 20% + 15.5% = 35.3% of so-called “benefits” for their rightful owner, the U.S Federal Government, from which all blessings flow.
3. Thirdly, all Useless Eaters must be encouraged to self-terminate by aggressively promoting a financial incentive to do so. Consider that if an individual with eleven years remaining life expectancy could be induced to self-terminate by a lump sum payment of one year’s “Social Security benefits,” (the Sunset Bonus) the Government would save ten years benefit payments on that individual. Should one year’s benefits not be adequate, the lump sum must be increased until the desired rate of acceptance is achieved.
Of course, termination must be accomplished by so-called “ethical” means, which would preferably involve high officials of die Interessengemeinschaft Mediziner Industrie AG , who could be counted upon to promote the desired objective, since they would stand to benefit to an extraordinary degree. Naturlich, the cost of implementation must be included when accounting for the costs versus benefit of the program.
Tschüß, und Willkommen im Affenhaus.
Adi
